Sunday, 29 May 2011

Egypt since Feb 11: A Summary

Since my last post, I have been trying to wrap my head around what's happening in Egypt. Where do I even start? Blogger Sandmonkey has been doing a great job, with really insightful, well-written pieces.

But then I found this clip from Egyptian actor Mohammed Sobhy's appearance on Dream TV last Thursday. And it sums it all up brilliantly. So here it is, and if anyone is willing to translate this or add English subtitles to it, please do.

It's literally a compilation of every piece of confusion that has overtaken our lives in Egypt today. And an emotional outburst that reflects what's inside many Egyptians today.

Thursday, 10 March 2011

Egypt Constitution Referendum: Define "Yes" and "No" please!

I've been observing a Google group debate about the Constitution Referendum for the past week or so. The arguments for voting "Yes" or "No" are both pretty strong, but the "No" camp seems to be stronger. I still cannot make up my own mind. Not for lack of analysis (been doing a lot of that through television, newspapers, social media, seminars and debates.

But because I simply don't know, in the practical world, what either result will mean for the Armed Forces.

I received this email today from Sina Birkholz, an expat living in Egypt, who makes some really valid and insightful points about the referendum, and what voters need to be considering. Please read and share:

Dear All,

I have so far not been contributing any posts to this list for the simple reason that I am one of those "foreigners" which happen to live in Egypt. But I have been closely following your discussions on constitutional change and the referendum coming up soon. Regarding the recent discussion between you as to what a NO in the referendum actually means and whether it is preferable over abstaining, I would like to share some hopefully useful thoughts with you. As for my own political background and experience: I studied political science, worked and volunteered for various NGOs and civil society organisations, grew up in Germany and thus was confronted with elections and referendum-type polls (slightly different rules and terms apply in German law) regularly.

Referendums are a problematic issue and their use for democratic systems is heavily contested. (To give an example: Being a direct democracy Switzerland makes ample use of them, while the German constitution does not allow for referendums in most cases. The German fear of referendums goes back to its Nazi past and results in a tendency to rather leave major political decisions to a political system characterised by checks and balances and lengthy complicated processes of negotiation and reflections rather to a one-time public vote.)

One of the reasons why referendums are considered problematic is: They have to break down very complicated political issues to simple closed questions. The answer is yes or no - nothing else. And this is exactly the dilemma many of you are facing now: you would like to say "No, I do not support the changes because I want a fully new constitution." or "No, I do not think these changes go far enough, more articles need to be amended before we can hold elections." But all you can say on the 19th of March is NO. And this No could then be interpreted as all of the above, but also as "NO, I think the old constitution is fine as it is, stop all this amendment hassle and let's have Adel Emam for president." ;)

What a majority "NO" in the referendum means is up to interpretation. To interpretation of the media, the public, and eventually those in power. Yet, what a NO does ensure is: the rulers (in our case the military council/Sharaf's cabinet) can proceed simply by bringing to force the 9 amendments and then move on. Yet, what exactly they then make of this, how they move forwards then, which alternative path they choose (no constitution, more amendments, sticking to an unchanged 1971 constitution) is up to them.

In a democratic system the trick is: the government is eager tor interpret the outcome of a referendum in the most appropriate way, simply because the government's reelection is dependent on people's satisfaction. So as an example: If Egypt had a democratically elected government now, which is accountable to the people and dependent on reelection in the upcoming June/September elections, they would try their best to interpret a majority "NO" on 19thMarch in the right way. Thus you could be pretty sure, that they would simply not dare to interpret the "NO" as ""NO, I think the old constitution is fine as it is, stop all this amendment hassle". The events and media coverage of the days since Jan 25 has made clear that there is no majority for sticking to an unchanged constitution.

Of course this is democratic theory, the reality is more complicated and problematic, and of course Egypt is not in the situation to have a democratic accountable government, YET. Nonetheless, I personally would be hopeful, that also the army council and Sharaf's government and the council responsible for reforming the constitution would not dare to interpret a "NO" as "NO, I think the old constitution is fine as it is, stop all this amendment hassle".

In general the following factors are decisive for the interpretation of a held referendum (and thus also for making up your mind about your personal and collective voting strategy):

- Voter turnout
(How many people showed up? Is this representative of the ppl allowed to vote? If not, because the number is to little or only voters for one side showed up - what is the reason? Rigged election/referendum? Or are ppl abstaining on purpose to express their protest?)

- Legally binding character of the referendum's outcome
(If ppl vote for NO, is the government/military council obliged to refrain from changing the constitution in the rejected way? If the vote is YES, are they legally obliged to follow through with the changes? The question whether a referendum's outcome is legally binding to the rulers/legislative is very important! It depends on a country's exact laws/constitution, and might often be conditional on a certain minimum of voter turnout! I do not know about the legal aspects in Egypt unfortunately.)

- Pledges made before the referendum
(What did those in power pledge to do if the outcome is YES or NO? Often governments tell people beforehand how they will deal with/interpret the various outcomes. An example could be "If the majority of people does reject my reform of the social insurance system, I will resign as a minister." or "If people do not vote in favour of the constitutional changes with a majority of at least 65%, we need to ask the reform committee to propose a more comprehensive set of amendments which has to satisfy a larger part of our people. This new draft will be put to another referendum in 4 months time." Statements like these are not as reliable as legally binding mechanisms, yet, if done in public they often enfold considerable binding power.)

- Politician's and activist's statements
(It makes sense not to look for pledges of the government/those in power only, but also to register how oppositional forces view the issue. If large parties/oppositional coalitions of civil society organisations promise to take a "NO" as a signal to fight for more comprehensive changes or a new constitution, there is a realistic chance that the outcome of a NO might be more substantial changes. Yet, if there is no one available and ready and strong enough to take up the cause afterwards, there's the danger that your NO might not have the effect you want it to have.)

- Media coverage
(How do the media judge public opinion and political developments? The media is by no way unbiased. Even if they might not follow their own agenda, they are for sure following their own laws. There is my opinion no point lamenting about this. As a consequence though it simply makes sense to constantly be critical and to consider them as one of the players in political games. Meaning: if the media at large say, a NO should be interpreted as such and such, there is a high likeliness that the media interpretation will be bought in by political actors. Also consider: often politicians/rulers are as much at a loss for how to understand what "the people really want" as we are, so just as we they need to rely on media and a lot of guessing for the interpretation of a referendum's outcome.)

- Public Opinion Polls
In many countries there are specific companies and institutes doing nothing else than oracle-ing about what people want and mean by a "NO" or "YES". One needs to be very careful with taking these public opinion polls at face value, yet, they always offer a nice incentive and pivotal point for debates!

And this probably is the most important point: the debates (in public, media, Saqia, the akhwas in bustan, the office of Sharaf, and of course on Mona Shazly's couch (does she actually have a couch or armchairs?)) which are surrounding the political process of the referendum in my opinion are what matters most. And above that it is public scrutiny and attention that afterwards ensures that a referendum is interpreted in a way that serves the original purpose.

As for the NO/YES/Abstaining issue there obviously is no simply answer, and it is probably not advisable to simply follow AlBaradei in his decision, you need to make up your mind for yourself, it's your own responsibility to look at all the aspects and then judge and chose. Imho Egyptians can only ensure that they hold their leaders accountable if they stop following and start to think through all these issues critically - just as you guys do here on the list.

Good luck. And please excuse if my lengthy explanations bored some of you, if it was useful only for one or two of you, I'm satisfied.


Wednesday, 2 March 2011

How to vote in Egypt today is anyone's guess

Since the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces announced that Egyptian citizens can vote using their National ID , and that the previous regime's so-called "Voting Cards" are unnecessary, mass confusion followed. I am receiving an onslaught of emails, Blackberry messages and Facebook messages about what to do, where to go, what documents are needed.

The deadline has varied from Saturday, 6th March to Tuesday, 8th March. And then there's the Ministry of Interior's Facebook page, which no one can really trust.

Until this morning, no one could tell me how to change my ID address from Alexandria to Cairo so I can vote in Cairo. I ventured onto the Ministry of Interior website . I called the number, and could not get through to the General Information desk (Al Este3lemat). So the operator said, "Go ahead, how can I help?"

Me: I want to update my National ID details from an Alexandria to a Cairo address and from single to Married.

MoI operator: So your husband's ID has your new address?

Me: Yes.

MoI operator: So take him with you, with his ID, marriage certificate and go to change it.

Me: Go where?

MoI operator: Anywhere you like.

Me: Should I go to the police station (2esm) that will be changing to? Kasr El Nil?

MoI: It doesn't matter.


Ok, so tomorrow I'm going to Kasr el nil station to try and do this, and then follow that with trying to register for the voting process.

Until then, I would also like to share some other people's experiences that I have received in the past 24 hours. If you or anyone you know have stories to tell, please do share them here.

- I went on Monday and did not need my birth certificate. Won’t hurt if you take it, but if you don’t have one handy, don’t worry about it.

- They just asked where I was born but did not ask for certificate. If you have it - take it. If you can't find it - don't let that stop you!

- I went in maadi. they said they only need birth certificates for those born starting 1982. They said I should come back after 2 days to take the number but they immediately told me the place I will go for voting.

- I am born in 1982 and they did not need a birth certificate. In any case, Take it if you have it, if not don’t let it stop you. Ps: the whole process takes less than 10 mintues

- I went for the voting card and didn't need a birth certificate. Is this registration the same as registering for beta2a intikhabeya? I hope I won't need to register again

-I applied last year, but didn't pick up my card because they said it wasn't issued yet. Now, my police station, Nasr City, is burned down. What should I do?

- In Nozha office Heliopolis they need birth certificate from anyone any age group!

- just got back min 2esm el dokki.. I asked the guy there why r they still issuing voting cards when the Supreme Military Council and Langent Ta3deel el dostour both confirmed that voting will be with the regular ID! The guy replied "Ana magaleesh Ta3leemat"! And he continued "if someone comes and asks me to do a voting card, mesh ha2ollo la2"!! I asked him if I apply for the voting card now when will I get it? He replied "April 21st" so I asked "but the dostour referendum is on March 19th, how will I vote on it?" He replied "Ma3rafsh"!!

Thursday, 3 February 2011

To Egypt, with love

Forgive me if this post is unstructured and emotionally charged, for I am angry and deeply hurt. I write this through tears of frustration and disbelief.

My last post was about Tunisians inspiring Egyptians. I was praying and hoping for us Egyptians to take a stand, to speak out. And we did.

We marched and screamed and demanded freedom of a dictatorship that filled us with apathy and frustration for 30 years. We united our voices. Unarmed. Peaceful. We marched.

On Friday, Jan 28th, we marched. We were attacked with tear gas and water cannons by the police. The police that was supposed to protect us. We defied them, unarmed, and we persisted until we made it from Mohandessin to Tahrir Square. I say unarmed again because it was only our determination that made us do it.

That night, the police was replaced by the army and the curfew imposed. A curfew that no one seemed to follow except for President Hosni Mubarak, who spoke to us so very late, with meaningless words that did not respond in the least to our demands.

As I made my way home on Friday night, I could not believe the complete disappearance of the police. I live in a part of Cairo full of embassies. There wasn't even a single security official outside any of the these buildings.

We were left alone to protect our own homes and neighbourhoods. With escaped convicts roaming the streets - a sick conspiracy by the ruling party and former Minister of Interior - we were left alone. Men, women and boys alike held all kinds of makeshift weapons and blockaded the streets. We heard gunshots fired all night for a week, terrified of the lengths our government would go to to shut us up, and teach us a lesson. We lived in fear.

But no fear is greater than the fear we live in now. After yesterday's events, it has become clear that the ruling party will do anything to stay in power. Because the army will never harm civilians, they had to find another way of breaking the protesters. Hiring thugs to attack peaceful protesters? There are no words to describe this criminal act.

Until yesterday some of us had an inkling of hope. Some of us considered waiting until the next elections. Some of us were fooled.

Anything that the government does now is too late. It's too late. You cannot be trusted. We don't want you. The people have spoken.

We are not Israeli spies. We are not CIA. We are not Hamas. We are not Al Qaeda. We are not the Muslim Brotherhood.

We are the people.

Tuesday, 11 January 2011

Inspirational Violence

Tunisian youth are protesting violently against unemployment and corruption among the ruling elite. The North African country has an unemployment rate of more than 13%. And with a population of just 10.4 million, that's a lot of jobless people.

The violence is linked by some sources to a Wikileaks document released last month, that reveals US Foreign Policy on Tunisia and the concerns it has over Tunisia's internal politics. One of the key passages states that "The problem is clear: Tunisia has been ruled by the same president for 22 years. He has no successor. "

Now, I can't help but start to draw a comparison here.

Egypt has an unemployment rate of 8.4%. That's less than Tunisia. But Egypt has a population of more than 80 million. That's quite a lot of angry, frustrated, jobless people.

We've had the same president for 30 years. He has no successor. We supposedly have presidential elections this year. We have no candidates. We have a single party government, with zero representation from the opposition.

So... my question is... aren't we sitting on a time bomb? There might be a lot more to this than a simple, straightforward comparison. Maybe if I conducted a very thorough analysis of the socio-economic and political situations in each country, I would see this differently. But right now, it does seem that simple.

Tuesday, 4 January 2011

2011 started in Alexandria

I always imagined I'd launch this blog on a positive note, simply because I left The Conversation at an all-time high.

But the event that kicked off 2011 in Alexandria on New Year's Eve makes me wonder how the next 12 months will turn out.

The one thing I've been wanting to scream at everyone, is that those who died in that horrendous crime were Egyptian citizens. People died.

Of course, the mass media frenzy, the sheer skill of knowing how to aggravate an audience - isn't new to us. This is quite similar what happened at the time of the Egypt-Algeria World Cup qualifier in 2009. The talk shows, the headlines, the emails...

I just hope we're a little bit wiser time. There are many calls for action, including going to church on Thursday night to attend the Coptic Christmas eve mass. A call to Egyptians. Pick a church, go and pray.

Pray that this weekend goes by in peace.